The thin white girl

Kim is 5 feet 2 inches. She is not a tall girl. I would class her as voluptuous not slim. There are plenty of girls (Black & Latina) who fall within her parameters running about wearing high heels to give the impression of being taller. If you only focus on her chest and buttocks you will not notice that she is indeed a short girl.

When someone is classed thin it is based on his or her overall symmetry. Not, two body parts.

Cheers!

 

Do you think she is size 6 (UK) or less?

 

She looks around an 8-10(UK). Her jeans might actually be bigger though because according to her, her measurements are 34-26-39. She says she is a size two but I doubt it. She is far from fat though, she is curvy but slender.


http://www.zimbio.com/Kim+Kardashian+Sex+Tape/articles/673/Kim+Kardashian+Weighs+Size+Shape
http://www.skinnyvscurvy.com/kim-ka...s-shes-117-lbs-and-fits-in-size-27-jeans.html

 

Sir Nose,

With a 39-inch hip she will fit a UK 10 - 12 or USA 8 - 10. For all the blokes who are not familiar with Women sizes, 34(Bust)-26(Waist)-39(Hips) is based on inches which is equilvalent to Men's size in Jeans.

She is pear-shaped. Her hips will limit her from wearing a Women's size 2 which is 32 in US Men's jeans.

http://www.usatourist.com/english/tips/Womens-Sizes.html

Cheers!

 

So Kim does not meet your standards.

 

Kim is a voluptuous girl and, I don't fancy voluptuous girls.

Cheers!

 

Did I ever say she was tall? In the pic I posted she isn't wearing heels. She isn't extremely thin but she is still within a healthy BMI and considered reasonably fit. Like I said thats the biggest I will go though. I like thinner too. The rest of what you said is completely irrelevant to anything I said in my post.


Cheers!

 

Hey you fellas were supposed to be talking about thin girls here, not about Kim's fat ass again...

 

Thin just doesn't do it for me. I don't like skinny. It isn't sexy to me. I want a type of girl, who I can take to a restaurant and she orders a steak, not a salad. I like boobs (real) I like hips, I like ass, I like the bigger woman. That is hot to me.

 

Mate, it is obvious you are upset for reasons only you would know based on your reply.

Keep in mind everyone has a right to his or her opinion and, at no point did I state your opinion is wrong. I was merely bringing it to your attention that she is a short girl despite the camera tricks that is all so popular with video.

Surely, if she were taller her figure would not be so voluptuous which is the reason she is getting so much attention in the first place.

Whether you consider her thin or I class her as voluptuous, it should not matter for it is not going to affect neither of our lives on the dating scene.


Personally, I use somatypes as a base when admiring girls, which I can detect faster than estimating a girl’s BMI as she walks down the street.


Cheers!

 

I rarely talk about girls that don't tickle my fancy. However, I just needed to set the record strait. There are too many beautiful girls in the world to focus on Kim Kardashian. Especially in my case where all petite – slim girls are fair game and, not rejected based on the complexion of her skin.

Cheers!

 

It sounds to me we fancy same kind of women, will stay out of your pub.


Cheers!

 

Kim's hip-to-waist ratio classifies her as a model for callipygean sculpture, as the curvature of her posterior has an orbital wave that suggests Jupiterean ambitions.

Are you still reading? Why?

Cheers!

100%
WANKER

 

No, I think you took me wrong. I was simply clearing up my opinion and noting that the majority of what you responded to me with had nothing to do with my actual post. The cheers thrown in at the end was nothing personal just thrown back playfully.

Of course -- There is no formal definition of what is thin or voluptuos.

I disagree, height alone is irrelevant when talking of how thin or voluptuous someone is. For example if you take two women - one 5'1, and the other 5'11 and they have the same BMI and porportions the one that is 5'11 is not automatically thinner just because "she is taller". You may have meant if Kim K was taller and thinner she would be less voluptous which would have actually made since IMO.

You mean somatotypes-- as in the three classifications of ectomorph, endomorph and mesomorph. For me it is literally impossible to determine this based on vision alone since by definition the three classifications are based on tissue pre-disposal alone. For example -- a women that is an ectomorph simply means that her embryonic ectoderm tissues predominate. In other words, she is more pre-disposed to be lean but whether she actually is or not depends on a variety of different things.

Basically there is no way to tell visually from looking at random women on the street which three classifications of the somatotype model that an individuals tissues fall into.

Now- there is no way I personally can tell what someones specific BMI number is but im a diet/athletic training minor so I can definately tell you at least if its considered within a healthy/fit range. whether Kim K is "thin" or not is up for personal opinion but there is no arguing that she still falls within what is considered a healthy/fit BMI range.

 

I'd focus more on body fat % and less on BMI since it fails to take into account bone density, muscle mass etc. Any shorter person with a stockier/muscular build will have an "unhealthy" BMI. For my BMI to be "normal" (considering my height) I'd have to weigh what I did in high school (132 to 152 lbs). I'm 181...could probably lose about 10 lbs...but I'd still be "high"...yet my body fat is pretty decent.

 

I propose we split the world in half and reap the benefits. You stay on one end while I will stay on the other. Vacationing would carry us on the opposite side of the globe, which would offer not only a change of scenery but also the opportunity to get better acquainted with the female natives.

Cheers!

 

My apologies!

That is exactly what I meant.

Actually there is however, you would need to be an avid “gym rat” to notice.

Mesomorph Women have broad shoulders, a narrow waist, with hips and, look naturally athletic. However their hips never exceed their shoulders. Jessica Biel fits that category.



Ectomorph Women have narrow shoulders and typically look petite. Their legs tend to always look skinny and have very small waist. Winona Ryder fits that criterion.




Endormorph Women offer broad shoulders as a Mesomorph Woman however their waist is not as narrow and tend to blend very well with their hips like Colbie Caillat.



There is far more to it like cheekbones, posture and, so forth. In addition to the intertwining of two traits merging together which is very common. However, if you are familiar with bodybuilder types, you can easily detect a Woman’s shape with her clothes on.



Cheers!

 

I agree, good point. The same happened with me when I started working out alot back in high school. I gained musle mass and was probably stretching the BMI but had still had a healthy BF%.

Okay so you are using the term as it is used frequently amongst bodybuilders as opposed to its medical definition. I'm familiar with that. Fair enough. Although we slightly disagree on the topic as a whole i'm glad we are on the same page now.

 

Mmmmm. Jessica Biel.:smt110

 

I learned the traits from those who went into competition. Bodybuilder trainers were the only ones that could answer my questions regarding my body type which, many fitness trainers could not.

When you are surrounded by nothing but blokes training for the pre-judging, you learn to identify certain characteristics that vary per body type.

Girls that offer Mesomorph, Ectomorph and/or, a combination of Ecto-Mesomorph traits are my cup of tea. However, I tend to date more Ecto-Mesomorph and, Ectomorph girls. This is due to the rarity of Mesomorphs.

Jessica Biel, Emma Watson and, Winona Ryder falls within body characteristic I only date.

Upon looking at that photo, I always mistake her for being Latina. She actually looks nothing like the re-runs of 7th Heaven I've seen on cable in
that picture.


Cheers!