Yeah you are right. he stepped and then she spoke. Then she pushed and slappedYou are wrong here GL, he turns to leave and then turns back of his own volition in response to something she said, not because she grabbed him. Then she pushes him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah you are right. he stepped and then she spoke. Then she pushed and slappedYou are wrong here GL, he turns to leave and then turns back of his own volition in response to something she said, not because she grabbed him. Then she pushes him
And as people say don't start nothing won't be nothing. I don't feel sorry for the chick. He shouldn't have followed her but never put your hands on anybody. Ever.
Also, I have a hard time with that statement. He didn't continue the attack. It was one punch. She continued the attack . The push/grab and shove. But as stated common sense and law dont go together
We agree that everybody should keep their hands to themselves. He did not have to continue the attack for it to be unreasonable or excessive, I can almost guarantee you the prosecution will argue that the force he used that resulted in serious medical injuries when he was in no fear for his life or any real danger was indeed excessive.
A defense could argue back that , using an analogy, u don't get to choose what weapon your opponent has. She knew what she was getting into when she raised her hands at a dude
The other problem is she wasn't in danger either. He didn't continue an assault . It was one punch.
I get What you are saying.. in court big difference
I don't feel sorry for that chick for getting rocked
You have repeatedly stated that you feel she got what she deserved and that you dont feel sorry for her. You are welcome to your opinion, as we have discussed before, we both feel that part of the benefit of this forum is to help guide and educate each other, so I do hope you understand the legal consequences that I and others have brought forth in this discussion and would encourage others (especially young men) to make the better, more intelligent choice to walk away if they ever find themselves in that situation.
He did. Right before she pushed him. He turned away then turned back (I'm guessing she said something to call him back).He did not try to walk away, what video did you watch?
He did. Right before she pushed him. He turned away then turned back (I'm guessing she said something to call him back).
That's before anyone touched each other, dude had all the time in the world to walk away after that initial push. When I watch it play by play I know why she pushed him, it was a defense mechanism because dude big as fuck in her personal space, that's what usually happens in those situations.
Not so fast there, this is why non-lawyers should not speculate on legal matters, the law is RARELY cut and dry. Here is a common definition of "self defense", one that the state of Oklahoma probably uses.
self-defense
"n. the use of reasonable force to protect oneself or members of the family from bodily harm from the attack of an aggressor, if the defender has reason to believe he/she/they is/are in danger. Self-defense is a common defense by a person accused of assault, battery or homicide. The force used in self-defense may be sufficient for protection from apparent harm (not just an empty verbal threat) or to halt any danger from attack, but cannot be an excuse to continue the attack or use excessive force. Examples: an unarmed man punches Allen Alibi, who hits the attacker with a baseball bat. That is legitimate self-defense, but Alibi cannot chase after the attacker and shoot him or beat him senseless. If the attacker has a gun or a butcher knife and is verbally threatening, Alibi is probably warranted in shooting him. Basically, appropriate self-defense is judged on all the circumstances. Reasonable force can also be used to protect property from theft or destruction. Self-defense cannot include killing or great bodily harm to defend property, unless personal danger is also involved, as is the case in most burglaries, muggings or vandalism."
Now the prosecution in this case will argue that the force the football player used was indeed excessive and unreasonable due to the great disparity in weight, height and strength. In other words the law allows plenty of room for BROAD interpretation as to what is reasonable and/or excessive. Bottom line the only way to protect yourself is to not put yourself in the situation to where you are at the mercy of such interpretations, walk away from any physical confrontation with a woman...period!
I remember seeing that a while back. She had it coming.
This is a perfect example of how defend yourself against an attack!
But she's a womanI remember seeing that a while back. She had it coming.
That's pretty screwed up.I remember seeing that a while back. She had it coming.
That's a fail.....lol. By going down with her he left himself open to attack. He should have stayed on his feet while boxing. If the second girl had a weapon he would be dead.
This is a perfect example of how defend yourself against an attack!
That was more than one girl, in that case you have no choice.That's pretty screwed up.
That's pretty screwed up.
That's a fail.....lol. By going down with her he left himself open to attack. He should have stayed on his feet while boxing. If the second girl had a weapon he would be dead.
Prefect? Lol