The heart beat abortion bill

You have a Masters degree and this is the link you posted?



I can't get enough of this thread.....Funny shit

 

If you actually read it you would know that you are wrong.... Again.

 

You specifically said sex was for procreation.
But nowhere is it stated that it's a males obligation to take care of it once it's here

 

Was that your first time trying to use a thesaurus? Lol

I don't think I ever seen a fail so epic.

 

So it just women's responsibility to do so right?

 

You dumb. You were trying to infer cause i used the word " believe" cause I'm a Christian. Scientists uses the hypothesis and believe because it means the same thing. You need to read.


Oh , I'm debating with a guy who thought all atheists are pro-abortion. Nevermind..lol

 

Hahahaha!

 

If sex is just for procreation...that doesn't indicate it's anyone's (woman or man) responsibility to take care of the kids. It's just about creating them.

I'm willing to bet that you (and everyone else) use sex for purposes other than procreation.

 

Pro abortion? Pro Choice is the word.

Agenda driven much?

And....you are still wrong on both accounts. Are you capable of learning? lol

Neva mind, you are "busting our ass with science" lmao

 

Exactly thank you
There's nothing written that says sex is for child rearing so by his logic we can procreate as much as we want and abort as much as we want. Or if he wants to throw the bible in there we can procreate and put the fetus in a basket and shove it down a river. Let go and let God right

 

What?

The conversation between us is this....

I'm saying if you impregnate a woman then you and that woman are to take care of it.

The primary scientific function of sex is to procreate. So according to your logic no one has to take care of it.

You have said in the past its bullshit to pay child support for a kid you don't want. Is that correct?

 

Are you agenda driven?

 

Smh never mind

 

Abortion is already legal.

So what is my agenda here Einstein?

Did I start a thread saying I have a "hypothesis" that "life begins when the bloods mix?" Lmfao!!

 

Goodlove I wish you could step back and see why everyone is giving you a hard time here. Your belief is all well and good but it doesn't mean it's scientific fact. Throwing that word around erroneously tends to irk people. You talk in absolutes when the topic itself isn't absolute. That's where I think you lose people. We know factually how embryos progress. We know fetal heart tones can be seen around 6 weeks. We know the heartbeat can be heard externally around the 12-13 week mark (on most women, depending on weight). We know when and how each organ grows. We know a typical pregnancy lasts around 40 weeks. Those are evidence based facts. When "life" begins can't be discussed in black and white like that because "life" is subjective. At the end of the day though, what anyone believes about when life begins doesn't mean jack shit. We're all entitled to our opinions. The issue constantly at hand is forcing women to abide by others beliefs. That's the pressing concern. What you believe, what I believe...none of that should impact anyone else so this whole conversation about when life begins just distracts from the actual problem at hand.

 

Dude is a har

And with these pro lifers I always have to ask how many kids have you adopted or fostered since you are all about preserving life

 

Well and they are usually the first to bitch about women being on welfare, food stamps, programs for the kids, and on and on it goes.

 

You're absolutely right. Most are simply pro birth. They want the life born, they don't care what happens after that. If they had any care about actual LIFE, they'd recognize the damage done by forcing women to continue pregnancies and birth unwanted children.

 

Exactly. Completely contradictory so why even engage. You can't reason with looney lonely and put out of touch

 

Well that would require empathy and that's against their religion..... wait.