An anti - BLM kills two cops. Wait what?

Like I said willful ignorance. It doesn't matter if it was cops or not the fact that he is willing to ignore facts says volumes.

Let's pretend it was just about black on black crime and blacks not working on it. He will still be wrong cause we been discussing that for years. He knows that. He just want to grab on to that bs. He's nothing more than a trolling tom

 

Better yet, you prove blacks talk more about whites killing black versus black on black.

 

:smt038:smt038:smt038

He's more of a Goblin than a Troll....more of a Sambo than a Tom.


"ok" is all he can manage without the help of Rush Limbaugh and Shawn Klanitty.

 

Fixed it for you.

 

..and zimmerman.

 

Uncle Paniro never mentions white on white crime...

 

So according to what you said to raider...that my statement saying blacks have been discussing black on black crime is pov and not fact but Dylan roofs statement is fact and not pov?

 

Yeah it's a false narrative to minimize killings to what race everybody is. Unless it has been investigated and proven to be hate crimes, then black on black crime isn't a credible thing, because white people have a high white on white homicide rate in mostly or only white neighborhoods. Many people have proved these things, but people want to push for them to be credible because of foolish pride in wanting to be right a lot and complacency along with wanting to push the narrative that being black is inherently criminal. Some people just hate that facts have proven them wrong.


BTW Have people notice that crimes white people lead the country in isn't treated the same way(like an epidemic and a concerned with that race.) by MSM and both parties like the way they treat high crime rates involving black people. White Privilege? Racism?

 

Those are symptoms for the correct term you're looking for.

 

I don't think anyone is claiming that the Dems have all of the answers, but they sure as hell beat the crap that the other side is pushing.

 

I have never seen one democrat on this board disagree with one thing coming from the left. Hell you haven't.....so you must believe they have all the answers.

You might as well have said "I don't think anyone is claiming that the Dems have all the answers BUT, I think they have all the answers......"

When you throw that "but" in there you negated everything after. Just tell the truth. Lol

 

I wonder what answers Republicans have other than hate and fear? It's weird the GOP misses no opportunity to tell us Dems don't have all the answers but can't come up with any answers themselves. Does that sound right to you?

 

You didn't answer the question or should I reword it for you. You said to raider below.

[QUOTES=Paniro187;1039148]It's not Everytime. He and I will never see eye to eye on a damn thing so I acknowledge his post then move on. Alot of "facts" are facts as a person sees them. Some are black and white some can be taken a different way. If you have a certain mindset many of these "facts" will be taken whichever way your disposition takes you. Many of you here have a different view on things than I do. I realize tjat, will state my opinion from here on out and not sit here and bicker back and forth as if anyone's mind will change. Don't like it? I could give a flying fuck.

You will respond to this. I wont. Then just laugh at you chimping out over it.[/QUOTE]
I told you that you and him were false. I told and showed you facts that showed you different.

Where are your facts? Show me.

 

You've chosen what you want to read. I personally talked about the Libya issue with POJ and how it was the wrong call.
I'm certain that people wanted a better aca plan than what we got.

 

I told you that you and him were false. I told and showed you facts that showed you different.



Where are your facts? Show me.[/QUOTE]

Now you know I have long since stopped communicating with you outside of negative talk about black women on this board. In that topic you do seem somewhat stable. Anything else you just ape the fuck out. So in this subject to you in particular.......OK

 

Oh geez you right here and there I see a member or two dare go against the status quo, by and large though it's a democrat cheerleading session.

 

Your point is similar to what I was saying earlier about the different treatment of white right-wing political violence versus Islamic extremism, etc. Actions by and concerns of whites are almost treated as inherently normative, and thus merit different treatment than similar actions of blacks or other non-white people. Segments of the Black and Latino populations have been wrestling with heroin addiction for decades, but when does anyone here remember the sort of national attention on opiate addiction being discussed this year? The same is true with political violence. White right-wing violence had been, prior to 9/11/2001, the most serious expression of politically motivated violence in the nation, yet no serious focus. Members of law enforcement and the military have been implicated in many instances, yet no thorough housecleaning for these organizations. It's just a case of disparate treatment, plain and simple.

I wasn't trying to set off an intra-forum argument, just discussing the internal dynamics of the militia movement.

Now just a minute, sir. I'm way farther to the left than a petty Democrat. LOL

 

One thing I have always liked about you Loki tdk and few others is that y'all are not disrespectful if your disagreement with opposing viewpoints. When people ape the fuck out that doesn't help anyone.

 

I'm more into discussion than arguing, as a general rule. I'm used to not agreeing with people around me, but that doesn't mean we can't get along on a host of other points.

 

The problem with people like paniro is that he take questioning as a sign of disrespect. He made a statement about tdk 's position inferring having no merit cause it lack facts but when he's questioned then it's am insult.

That's funny to me